+- Little Fighter Empire - Forums (https://lf-empire.de/forum)
+-- Forum: Empire Zone (https://lf-empire.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Contests (https://lf-empire.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=47)
+--- Thread: Contest #20: Tournament (/showthread.php?tid=8564)
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - Silverthorn - 05-04-2013
Alright, once again, thank you all for your participation! I am happy to now announce the final results:
1st: Lord Silva
2nd: Everisto
3rd: AzrielCongratulations to you!
<hr style="color: #FFD700; background-color: #FFD700; height: 1px;" />
After having evaluated all replays, I felt so free to put up some stats about the matches:
Shortest match
17s (Jerkington XIII vs. Everisto, match 2)
17s (Blue Phoenix vs. qwertz143, match 5)
Longest match
7min52s (The Lost Global Mod vs. YinYin, match 3)
Least attack
0 (Emaan Ashraf, vs. Omega, match 2)
0 (Vineet, vs. Redbeard, match 5)
0 (Someone else, vs. Blue Phoenix, matches 3&4)
0 (The Heskey, vs. YinYin, match 4)
0 (xmfcx, vs. The Lost Global Mod, match 4)
0 (Azriel, vs. Kevin, match 1)
0 (qwertz143, vs. Blue Phoenix, match 5)
0 (Jerkington XIII, vs. Everisto, matches 1&2)
Most attack
1480 (YinYin, vs. The Lost Global Mod, match 3)
Least HP Lost
0 (Everisto, vs. Jerkington, matches 1&2)
0 (The Lost Global Mod, vs. xmfcx, match 4)
0 (Kevin, vs. Azriel, match 1)
0 (Blue Phoenix, vs. Someone else, match 4)
0 (Redbeard, vs. Vineet, match 5)
0 (Blue Phoenix, vs. qwertz143, match 5)
0 (YinYin, vs. The Heskey, match 4)
0 (Omega, vs. Emaan Ashraf, match 2)
Most HP Lost
1480 (The Lost Global Mod, vs. YinYin, match 3)
Least MP used
0 (Everisto, vs. Kevin, match 1)
0 (Kevin, vs. Azriel, match 1)
0 (Kevin, vs. Omega, match 1)
0 (Someone else, vs. Everisto, match 1)
Most MP used
11250 (xmfcx, vs. The Lost Global Mod, match 1)
Least pickings
Too many with 0 to list them all
Most pickings
32 (Someone else, vs. Bamboori, match 4)
<hr style="color: #FFD700; background-color: #FFD700; height: 1px;" />
Moar stats!
The average match had the following stats:
Time: 0:01:24
Attack (winner): 690
Attack (loser): 356
HP Lost (winner): 361
HP Lost (loser): 701
MP Used (winner): 1298
MP Used (loser): 1401
Pickings (winner): 4
Pickings (loser): 3
<hr style="color: #FFD700; background-color: #FFD700; height: 1px;" />
You still can't get enough about stats? Here is my txt-file which sums up how well each player-slot performed:
Spoiler (Click to View)
Still not finding what you're looking for? This is the whole Excel-document: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47052361/LF/LFE-Contest-20-Tournament-Results.xlsx
<hr style="color: #FFD700; background-color: #FFD700; height: 1px;" />
I'm still open to any form of critique regarding the tournament (thanks for your input, empirefantasy!). Mention what you like, dislike, etc, to make the next tournament even better!
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - qwertz143 - 05-04-2013
MAKE THIS A YEARLY COMPETITION!
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - YinYin - 05-04-2013
The only thing I didn't like was matches not taking place and people dropping out.
Maybe for the next fighting tournament we should use a few pre rounds for qualification that will also make sure people actually participate.
So instead of everyone just posting that they want to join and you wasting time setting up matches with half of them not taking place everyone should seek his first opponent on his own and fight matches for one round according to the rules.
Once the joining phase+rounds are over all the ones that could prove they can arrange their matches and abide the rules are in and you can start planning the next rounds.
That way you would also prevent an odd number of participants.
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - qwertz143 - 05-04-2013
Or we could have this throughout the year and convert this tournament into a league table and each player has to play everyone twice and you get points for draw wins and losses
LFE PREMIER LEAGUE FTW!
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - Silverthorn - 05-05-2013
(05-01-2013, 04:31 PM)empirefantasy Wrote: I am against disallowing some special moves, or better say limiting the number of them, even this makes a little more interesting since player may be trapped in some moments of the fight since he/she cat use the move that would save him.I understand your discomfort about the move-limitations. However, these moves have a reasoning behind them. For example, Rudolf's invisibility. At low HP, the MP-recovery is extremely fast and so you can stay invisible almost all the time. Same with Henry's flute. And battling a constantly-fluting Henry on HK-Coliseum is extremely annoying.
Sure, I can cancel out any move-limitations for the next tourney but I am not sure if this will not unbalance the matches completely. Opinions?
(05-01-2013, 04:31 PM)empirefantasy Wrote: Another thing that i would like to be improved are the number of rounds, just seven are less while 15 were too much, but better it would have been 10 rounds, anyways its not a big deal.In retrospect, yes, 7 might look like it'd have not been enough. In the future, I am going to increase the rounds-per-participants-ratio to something like 1/2 (not 1/3 like this time). We'll see about it
.gif ";)")
(05-04-2013, 12:49 PM)qwertz143 Wrote: MAKE THIS A YEARLY COMPETITION!I don't know if I want to have that hassle every year
(05-04-2013, 12:51 PM)YinYin Wrote: The only thing I didn't like was matches not taking place and people dropping out.Fully agreed!
(05-04-2013, 12:51 PM)YinYin Wrote: Maybe for the next fighting tournament we should use a few pre rounds for qualification that will also make sure people actually participate. [...]Sounds like a great plan! Setting up 1 or 2 pre-fights shouldn't be much of an issue; and starting the tournament (with points etc.) after those could really help as well.
(05-04-2013, 01:07 PM)qwertz143 Wrote: Or we could have this throughout the year and convert this tournament into a league table and each player has to play everyone twice and you get points for draw wins and lossesI don't know how it is for you, but from my point of view, it was quite annoying to run after the people reminding them to get their match done. Doing this for a whole year doesn't sound much pleasant.....
LFE PREMIER LEAGUE FTW!
Furthermore, I doubt that many people would like to do this throughout a whole year; especially during the holidays-seasons, things could get quite bad (ie. I love traveling abroad with no internet whatsoever).
By the way, which system do you prefer most?
- The classic one: lose once, you're out
- Modified classic: after two losses, you're out
- Round Robin/Swiss: the system I have used in this tournament
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - YinYin - 05-05-2013
(05-05-2013, 03:04 PM)Blue Phoenix Wrote: Round Robin/Swiss: the system I have used in this tournament
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - qwertz143 - 05-05-2013
(05-05-2013, 03:04 PM)Blue Phoenix Wrote: Round Robin/Swiss: the system I have used in this tournament
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - The Lost Global Mod - 05-06-2013
(05-05-2013, 03:04 PM)Blue Phoenix Wrote: Round Robin/Swiss: the system I have used in this tournament
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - A-Man - 05-06-2013
(05-05-2013, 03:04 PM)Blue Phoenix Wrote: Round Robin/Swiss: the system I have used in this tournament
RE: Contest #20: Tournament - Everisto - 05-06-2013
Why Round Robin/Swiss? Here we had a random opponents and it was not until the end of the fair. Those who are not on the podium could be the toughest opponents, and those who are on the podium could have easily.
In my view, the first system is the best. Since winning the best player who eliminates all. This system is the best indicator of the player's skill.
Therefore prefer The Classic system.