![]() |
|
[char] Dijeng - Printable Version +- Little Fighter Empire - Forums (https://lf-empire.de/forum) +-- Forum: Little Fighter 2 Zone (https://lf-empire.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Sprites (https://lf-empire.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Thread: [char] Dijeng (/showthread.php?tid=1902) Pages:
1
2
|
[char] Dijeng - lf2TimmE1 - 01-17-2009 her is a char of mine i made in five minutes cause of boredom^^
RE: [char] Dijeng - kubamaster93 - 01-17-2009 Hehe :P Monk as base? Hmm, very good. I like him because he has got darker skin than other chars in LF2. It is more original. RE: [char] Dijeng - Bamboori - 01-17-2009 hey, cool :P he looks originally because of the darker skin (as km93 said ) and he has an originally weapon: a simple stick ![]() he looks very lf2-styled aswell (duh, expectable for a sprite from YOU )the contrast of his skin and his clothes looks very good aswell
RE: [char] Dijeng - lf2TimmE1 - 01-17-2009 another char i drawed because of boredom
RE: [char] Dijeng - Silverthorn - 01-17-2009 I'm not sure if the topic title "[char]" fits in here, it's more or less a compilation of standing poses of different characters. With that being said, I must admit: you're a really great spriter, both of your images look awesome. I like that you make them very unique, not just c&p. Yea, sometimes you see parts of existing characters but you "hide" it really well so that it doesn't stick out so much. Great work, keep it up
RE: [char] Dijeng - Simoneon - 01-18-2009 if you will do chars form those standing sprites i think chars will be veeeery good
RE: [char] Dijeng - Marshall - 01-18-2009 any plans of making them into actual playable characters? RE: [char] Dijeng - lf2TimmE1 - 01-18-2009 i sure will make one complete playable char out of my coming tekken sprites.....but it is still in the stars whether there will be more RE: [char] Dijeng - YinYin - 01-18-2009 (01-18-2009, 04:11 PM)lf2TimmE1 Wrote: one complete playable charmere boredom wont get you there RE: [char] Dijeng - YinYin - 01-18-2009 kind of proves my point doesnt it |