Little Fighter Empire - Forums
[solved] negative Opoint without negative way. - Printable Version

+- Little Fighter Empire - Forums (https://lf-empire.de/forum)
+-- Forum: Little Fighter 2 Zone (https://lf-empire.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Data Changing (https://lf-empire.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+---- Forum: Solved Problems (https://lf-empire.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+---- Thread: [solved] negative Opoint without negative way. (/showthread.php?tid=2178)



[solved] negative Opoint without negative way. - vandesdelca - 02-22-2009

how to activate an Opoint with:
-Negative frame
-doesn't change the position of the Object
-and with the same dvy and dvx.

in pic. it was like:
from this ">" to
------------"<"this
not like ">"to
---------------"<"this


RE: negative Opoint without negative way. - Faidan - 02-22-2009

what exactly is negative opoint?
im not really good at the DC


RE: negative Opoint without negative way. - Azriel - 02-22-2009

why not opoint it then a wait: 0 next: -# in the opointed object? it does everything you want



Azriel~



RE: negative Opoint without negative way. - Alblaka - 02-22-2009

Or you could try "action: -xxx"...
Not sure, whether it works, but it bases on the same thing like "next" it should work... maybe...


RE: negative Opoint without negative way. - Lauli - 02-22-2009

vandesdelca Wrote:in pic. it was like:
from this ">" to
------------"<"this
not like ">"to
---------------"<"this

You DO know that this is exactly the same only that there are 3 symbols more?


RE: negative Opoint without negative way. - Silverthorn - 02-22-2009

(02-22-2009, 11:54 AM)Lauli Wrote:  You DO know that this is exactly the same only that there are 3 symbols more?
makes the thingy a bit more complicated :P

btw, what speaks against using facing: 1 instead of facing: 0?