Poll: so, what happens when you hit the number?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
CLOSE tha thread, I've had enough already, argh; I'm exhausted and my family needs me
17.14%
6 17.14%
CONTINUE counting (you won't even notice when the number is magically and silently increased; I've heard there are ninjas and a magician in the mod-team)
31.43%
11 31.43%
monetary PRICES; no, just kidding, who would give those, seriously now? maybe at least a single small forum award? you'd say
20.00%
7 20.00%
gather in a MEETING point and resurrect the lfe-ghosts by using the darkest, blackest magic there is
31.43%
11 31.43%
Total 35 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 26 Vote(s) - 3.96 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Count Thread
1283 It would be the end of life the universe and everything. (no 42)

Edit: Oops 1283 not 1823
Age ratings for movies and games (and similar) have never been a good idea.
One can learn a lot from reinventing wheels.
An unsound argument is not the same as an invalid one.
volatile in C++ does not mean thread-safe.
Do not make APIs unnecessarily asynchronous.
Make C++ operator > again
Trump is an idiot.
Reply
Thanks given by:
1284, let's keep this bandwagon going 'til 1336 just for the heck of it.

TITLE: a idea
make cave for bear?
Reply
Thanks given by:
1285, get a glowstick: http://z0r.de/?id=948
Reply
Thanks given by:
1286 for the heck of it
If at first you don't succeed, you're probably not going skydiving again.
Reply
Thanks given by:
1287, this is addicting O_o

TITLE: a idea
make cave for bear?
Reply
Thanks given by:
1288 I no understand
If at first you don't succeed, you're probably not going skydiving again.
Reply
Thanks given by:
(10-26-2009, 06:35 AM)snorsorbet Wrote:  1287, this is addicting O_o

1289 really?
Reply
Thanks given by:
(10-26-2009, 11:48 AM)HappyHouR Wrote:  
(10-26-2009, 06:35 AM)snorsorbet Wrote:  1287, this is addicting O_o

1289 really?

1290 no.
Age ratings for movies and games (and similar) have never been a good idea.
One can learn a lot from reinventing wheels.
An unsound argument is not the same as an invalid one.
volatile in C++ does not mean thread-safe.
Do not make APIs unnecessarily asynchronous.
Make C++ operator > again
Trump is an idiot.
Reply
Thanks given by:
1291 yesh!
Reply
Thanks given by:
(10-26-2009, 07:16 PM)Simoneon Wrote:  1291 yesh!

1292 buh . I wish its was over 9000 buts its over 1000.

(10-27-2009, 03:28 PM)Gad Wrote:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pToHAd2Ns2U - It's over 1000!

1293

Saw its before.Thanks anyway.
Reply
Thanks given by:




Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)