Poll: so, what happens when you hit the number?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
CLOSE tha thread, I've had enough already, argh; I'm exhausted and my family needs me
17.14%
6 17.14%
CONTINUE counting (you won't even notice when the number is magically and silently increased; I've heard there are ninjas and a magician in the mod-team)
31.43%
11 31.43%
monetary PRICES; no, just kidding, who would give those, seriously now? maybe at least a single small forum award? you'd say
20.00%
7 20.00%
gather in a MEETING point and resurrect the lfe-ghosts by using the darkest, blackest magic there is
31.43%
11 31.43%
Total 35 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 26 Vote(s) - 3.96 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Count Thread
Erm, it shoud be 1344, Someone else, not 1341...

1345 here.
Reply
Thanks given by:
1346 Fixed.
Age ratings for movies and games (and similar) have never been a good idea.
One can learn a lot from reinventing wheels.
An unsound argument is not the same as an invalid one.
volatile in C++ does not mean thread-safe.
Do not make APIs unnecessarily asynchronous.
Make C++ operator > again
Trump is an idiot.
Reply
Thanks given by:
1347

New sentence:

If
Reply
Thanks given by:
1348
if you
Reply
Thanks given by:
1349
If you stop.

No new stentence.
Reply
Thanks given by:
<DIV CONTENTEDITABLE>1350
Editable post.

And Ninja'd.</DIV>
Age ratings for movies and games (and similar) have never been a good idea.
One can learn a lot from reinventing wheels.
An unsound argument is not the same as an invalid one.
volatile in C++ does not mean thread-safe.
Do not make APIs unnecessarily asynchronous.
Make C++ operator > again
Trump is an idiot.
Reply
Thanks given by:
(11-04-2009, 08:02 PM)Lauli Wrote:  1349
If you stop.

No new stentence.

1351 why not ? geez I'm just trying to have a litte fun.Something wrong with that?
Reply
Thanks given by:
<DIV CONTENTEDITABLE>1352</DIV>
Not really.

Could be through.
Age ratings for movies and games (and similar) have never been a good idea.
One can learn a lot from reinventing wheels.
An unsound argument is not the same as an invalid one.
volatile in C++ does not mean thread-safe.
Do not make APIs unnecessarily asynchronous.
Make C++ operator > again
Trump is an idiot.
Reply
Thanks given by:
this is getting boring.

How about a new rule: You count from 0 upwards, and try to reach 100. One number per post. The catch is if ANY moderator or admin posts here, he resets the number to 0. :D
Quote of the Day f***ing Year (Click to View)
Reply
Thanks given by:
lol, what do we get if we reach 100?
And I would say we count down. ( finding the right number is about twice as hard :D)
100.
Reply
Thanks given by:




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)