Chat
Discord
07-04-2012, 11:35 AM
hmm about the Higgs_boson, as far as I understand (if I'm wrong, please state because I read everything quickly rather than carefully), even though it's called 'God Particle', actually it's another theory of how the universe was created, thus, instead, it disproves the existence of God since that certain particle is the substitute of the God Himself.
Btw, if you study bio-chemistry, lol, you are forced to believe that human consciousness (and spirit, and everything that we feel or think) are all a result of chemical reactions, thus souls never have existed.. perhaps most of those scientists are atheists then?
LOL at last I managed to read the whole five pages. Omg... so difficult to keep reading those things, but I really did. I see some of the points from the non-atheists as well. I even watched your video, Kashif, but... the arguments are quite easily denied, for example the first one, 'The Hour has come near, and the moon has split' , if later human landed on Moon and take sample rocks to the Earth, so that the Moon is somewhat split, it's just a coincidence.. because who will say the moon has split just because human took very very little portion of it? The next arguments can also be fought one by one, but I'm too tired to do it all..
If you guys have time, btw, please watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7E3Erouv9E
That video has been approved by many people, so I think it should contain many of the best arguments out there.
Btw, if you study bio-chemistry, lol, you are forced to believe that human consciousness (and spirit, and everything that we feel or think) are all a result of chemical reactions, thus souls never have existed.. perhaps most of those scientists are atheists then?
LOL at last I managed to read the whole five pages. Omg... so difficult to keep reading those things, but I really did. I see some of the points from the non-atheists as well. I even watched your video, Kashif, but... the arguments are quite easily denied, for example the first one, 'The Hour has come near, and the moon has split' , if later human landed on Moon and take sample rocks to the Earth, so that the Moon is somewhat split, it's just a coincidence.. because who will say the moon has split just because human took very very little portion of it? The next arguments can also be fought one by one, but I'm too tired to do it all..
If you guys have time, btw, please watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7E3Erouv9E
That video has been approved by many people, so I think it should contain many of the best arguments out there.
TEMPE
Spoiler (Click to View)