(06-01-2015, 11:18 PM)TheNave Wrote: Oh yeah, about the jernemies thingy...While this is well based in logic, you're not accounting my (+ pf's, I don't think anyone else was missing) inactivity at that point in the game. I posted my first thoughts partially in response to that post, and Amadis would have looked pretty stupid making statistics out of thin air, considering my only post was in response to a question about the rules. True, this isn't a clearance, inactivity being a semi-viable mafia strategy after all, but anyway.
As a base, I took the list of players Amadis posted at the beginning of day 1, I obviously suspect the people that were either "Townie" or "Unknown"...
Which are Ramond, PF, MangaD, Luti, Jernemies and EF... Ramond is obviously doc...
so out of PF, MangaD, Luti, Jernemies and EF, two must be mafia........
.......
Code:
What could happen besides this point:
Kill me -> innocent -> suddenly the logic against pf falls apart -> see if Luti is swaying -> ???
-> keep the finger pointed at Pf -> ???
-> Go after Amadis' list -> EF -> ???
-> Nave's evil shenanigans -> ???
-> MangaD's a master bluff apparently -> ???
Kill Luti -> see if he's swaying -> he isn't -> go for EF -> win
-> he is -> EF propably isn't it, so pf -> ???
-> Nave -> ???
-> Mangad -> ???
Kill PF -> mafia -> I die
-> ofc not, I'm obvs innocent after that
-> innocent -> suddenly the logic against me falls apart -> Luti -> ???
-> EF -> ???
-> Nave -> ???
-> Nah ofc not me -> ???
-> Mangad -> ???
Kill Nave -> godfather -> everything he's said can and will be used against him -> I don't even want to look into this mess now -> ???
Ramond wasn't included because nobody in their right minds would go after him for obvious reasons. In case you couldn't tell.
Somehow, the biggest amount of logic I've shown this game was a quick defensive post made in 3 AM. GJ me.