08-29-2015, 09:41 AM
First of all, 1% would be pretty high for people that geninuely have some health issue relating to their weight. Probably closer to 0.00000001% or something. Out of those people, the underlying medical condition can be treated pretty easily for most of them. There are a few medical issues that really suck. Like there is some weird one where people do not "feel" full regardless of how much they eat. I can imagine that would make losing weight harder...
But at the end of the day, it is like someone said, calories in vs calories out. If someone could create fat from nothing, then we would have solved the energy crisis by using those people as batteries or something(like the matrix). So it may be harder for some people to lose weight, but it is just physically not possible to not be fat without eating. You don't see starving fat people in poor 3rd world countries.
But at the end of the day, it is like someone said, calories in vs calories out. If someone could create fat from nothing, then we would have solved the energy crisis by using those people as batteries or something(like the matrix). So it may be harder for some people to lose weight, but it is just physically not possible to not be fat without eating. You don't see starving fat people in poor 3rd world countries.
10 ʏᴇᴀʀs sɪɴᴄᴇ ɪʀᴄ ɢᴏᴏᴅ.ɪ ᴡᴀʟᴋ ᴛʜʀᴏᴜɢʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇᴍᴘᴛʏ sᴛʀᴇᴇᴛs ᴛʀʏɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜɪɴᴋ ᴏғ sᴏᴍᴇᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴇʟsᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ᴍʏ ᴘᴀᴛʜ ᴀʟᴡᴀʏs ʟᴇᴀᴅs ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ɪʀᴄ. ɪ sᴛᴀʀᴇ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ sᴄʀᴇᴇɴ ғᴏʀ ʜᴏᴜʀs ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʀʏ ᴛᴏ sᴜᴍᴍᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ɢᴏᴏᴅ ɪʀᴄ. ɪ ᴡᴀᴛᴄʜ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ɪʀᴄ ᴄʜᴀɴɴᴇʟs ʙᴜᴛ ɪᴛ ɪs ɴᴏ ɢᴏᴏᴅ. ɪ ᴘᴇsᴛᴇʀ ᴢᴏʀᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʀʏ ᴛᴏ ʀᴇsɪsᴛ ʜɪs sᴇxɪɴᴇss ʙᴜᴛ ɪᴛ ɪs ᴀʟʟ ᴍᴇᴀɴɪɴɢʟᴇss. ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ɪs ɴᴇᴀʀ.ɪ ᴛʜᴇɴ ᴜsᴜᴀʟʟʏ ʀᴇᴀᴅ sᴏᴍᴇ ᴏʟᴅ ɪʀᴄ ʟᴏɢs ᴀɴᴅ ᴄʀʏ ᴍʏsᴇʟғ ᴛᴏ sʟᴇᴇᴘ.