[Debate]#Main: The Debate thread

[MnM]

In other words, you're still going to end up having a few specific leaders anyway. That said this also potentially solves the problem below assuming the representative is properly educated.

Yes, that is my point. Democracy consists of mob mentality, and everyone has different interests and misconceptions. It creates serious instability and division in a country.

we have access to everything and all the information is there but people are lazy and want to soley pleasure themselves and distance themselves off from the real world problems/current events then they probably wont care who is president even if the canidates tell us their true intentions.

This sums up the whole discussion. Even though mini-groups exist forming a larger group of people, the demands of each individual group cannot be fulfilled. Although not all the group might be well educated, this creates a whole different problem resulting in a mob movement. And people are not willing to involve themselves and practice democracy. We can as a result in my country at least suddenly newer groups emerge from no-where. Recently LGBT marriage was made legal in America, suddenly I am able to see there are many LGBT groups popping up all over the country. US government satisfied their need and so they are demanding our government to make it legal. Such is the situation right now. People are so selfish and when they want their needs to be satisfied they utilize the freedom of speech and right to express themselves as a weapon. Democracy wants active participation of the citizens. This doesn't mean creating a group and being idle, When a newly imposed law contradicts their theory, protest.Rather sit and come to conclusion.

It is much more clear now that these voicing rights are completely absent in any other form of government! Aristocracy and oligarchy might have a group of people different sectors, but what if these different sectors are from same religion. As far as I know, a king and their ministers are from same community/religion.

Ultimately the conclusion could be that there is no perfect form of government(that we know of already). The whole thing boils down to active participation of citizens in a decent and non-idiotic ways with advice from the professionals. Democracy is inevitable in recent years. While strict and stringent laws can make good citizens, it cannot spoil the interest of individuals/strip-off their rights.

I will be closing this topic on Sunday and post up a new one. If anyone has any more ideas/disagreement you can very well post them here.

Edit: If you have suggestions for next debate, send me a PM pls!