Chat
Discord
12-25-2015, 06:04 AM
@Azriel : Nice thought with the patrolling cars but how can you be sure people don't require personal cars? Everyone would like to buy one cool driver less cars..
@Bamboori : Well, there is this thing. All cars need not be converted into driver less. Recently based upon the test runs, the driver less cars almost can move seamlessly in traffic with humans. Accidents might happen due to manual drivers.Google is however planning to completely remove the cruise control on the cars!(cruise control allows a person to take charge of the driving at emergency situation). But this leaves us with another problem as @Rhino.Freak mentioned. Almost all software have some chance of failure. Bugs can however be rectified but there still is some insecurity. Emergency situation is still possible since all the cars cannot be driver less. Seems very less practical from my point of view same like @STM1993 mentioned but is it possible at all!?
Most of the points made here are pointing towards individual advantage. But do you think there needs to be some ethics in development? @A-Man : Even though you might sound driving is a low-skilled job. There is growing unemployment all over the world. This might totally affect the economy and standard of living. Uber is planning to replace all its cars autonomous.
The way I see driver less cars is a model of car and nothing more than that. Getting clearance from each country/state is another major problem.
I might seem to take a bane side owing to the fact only one person said it is a bane. I hope you guys don't take the word bane literally and think in terms of viable or not viable.
@Bamboori : Well, there is this thing. All cars need not be converted into driver less. Recently based upon the test runs, the driver less cars almost can move seamlessly in traffic with humans. Accidents might happen due to manual drivers.Google is however planning to completely remove the cruise control on the cars!(cruise control allows a person to take charge of the driving at emergency situation). But this leaves us with another problem as @Rhino.Freak mentioned. Almost all software have some chance of failure. Bugs can however be rectified but there still is some insecurity. Emergency situation is still possible since all the cars cannot be driver less. Seems very less practical from my point of view same like @STM1993 mentioned but is it possible at all!?
Most of the points made here are pointing towards individual advantage. But do you think there needs to be some ethics in development? @A-Man : Even though you might sound driving is a low-skilled job. There is growing unemployment all over the world. This might totally affect the economy and standard of living. Uber is planning to replace all its cars autonomous.
The way I see driver less cars is a model of car and nothing more than that. Getting clearance from each country/state is another major problem.
I might seem to take a bane side owing to the fact only one person said it is a bane. I hope you guys don't take the word bane literally and think in terms of viable or not viable.