Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[C++] Inheritance Diamond Problem
#8
(01-12-2016, 10:26 PM)Nightmarex1337 Wrote:  I think there are enough evidence to prove that.
Then it should not be hard to find some.

(01-12-2016, 10:26 PM)Nightmarex1337 Wrote:  I know C++ have multithreading. I said "when dealing with low level C API's" if you know what I mean.
The solution would be to not deal with low-level C APIs, which the vast majority of the time is trivially simple. When you have to deal with low-level C APIs you write a wrapper for it once, and use that from then on. Better yet, you find some code that already does it and use that.
Age ratings for movies and games (and similar) have never been a good idea.
One can learn a lot from reinventing wheels.
An unsound argument is not the same as an invalid one.
volatile in C++ does not mean thread-safe.
Do not make APIs unnecessarily asynchronous.
Make C++ operator > again
Trump is an idiot.
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
RE: [C++] Inheritance Diamond Problem - by A-Man - 01-06-2016, 09:10 PM
RE: [C++] Inheritance Diamond Problem - by Som1Lse - 01-12-2016, 10:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)