As i recall some stuff in statistics, the error for a random sample is equal to 100/Sqrt(number of samples).
What this means is for 200 samples that you tested in the arest randomness, the random error is equal to 100/Sqrt(200), roughly equal to 7.07%
By taking the average data in Ttl5 in 5itr, Ttl4 in 4itr, Ttl3 in 3itr and Ttl2 in 2itr, the percentage for bottommost itr to take effect is 47.6+-7.07%, that is (40.7-52.6%)
I am inclined to what Nyamaiku said, the arest trigger couldn't be put into a ridiculous percentage like 45%. It is reasonable to think at followed:
2itr:
1st 50%
2nd 50%
3itr:
1st 25%
2nd 25%
3rd 50%
4itr:
1st 12.5%
2nd 12.5%
3rd 25%
4th 50%
5itr:
1st 8.333%
2nd 8.333%
3rd 8.333%
4th 25%
5th 50%
The mess i talked in the last paragraphs was just to show the statistic result fall into the percentages i proposed.
What this means is for 200 samples that you tested in the arest randomness, the random error is equal to 100/Sqrt(200), roughly equal to 7.07%
By taking the average data in Ttl5 in 5itr, Ttl4 in 4itr, Ttl3 in 3itr and Ttl2 in 2itr, the percentage for bottommost itr to take effect is 47.6+-7.07%, that is (40.7-52.6%)
I am inclined to what Nyamaiku said, the arest trigger couldn't be put into a ridiculous percentage like 45%. It is reasonable to think at followed:
2itr:
1st 50%
2nd 50%
3itr:
1st 25%
2nd 25%
3rd 50%
4itr:
1st 12.5%
2nd 12.5%
3rd 25%
4th 50%
5itr:
1st 8.333%
2nd 8.333%
3rd 8.333%
4th 25%
5th 50%
The mess i talked in the last paragraphs was just to show the statistic result fall into the percentages i proposed.