(10-08-2018, 07:13 PM)A-Man Wrote: Black skin corresponds to more resistance against bad sunlight, but does that matter so much really?
Yes, it matters. There are people whose skin color is so light that they get easily burned from sun exposure and can't even get tanned. Skin color also affects the synthesis of vitamin D, people with darker skin require more sun exposure or else they will lack vitamin D. This changes the types of work and environment people are qualified for, dark skin is good for working outdoors in a hot environment, light skin is good for working indoors or in a cold environment.
How does this come into play in society? Well, if you have mass migration from Asia and Africa into white countries, whilst white countries have low birth rates, sooner or later whites will become a minority (they already are actually) and this globalization and miscegenation in the long run (100-200 years) will eventually get rid of our biological diversity developed throughout millions of years, meaning that the adaptation qualities that we developed to all environments on Earth will be lost.
More importantly, the IQ question. Suppose that blacks have a lower IQ compared to other races, and that they are the majority on the planet (they aren't), miscegenation with other races would decrease the average IQ of humankind.
(10-08-2018, 04:20 PM)LutiChris Wrote: 1) American society is stratifying along class lines as high and low IQ populations interbreed.
2) IQ is largely immutable, social programs have limited returns.
3) The welfare state is having a dysgenic effect on the population of America.
4) Racial differences in IQ better explain the discrepancy in performance between groups than other factors.
5) Because of the above America should reduce the welfare state to stop needless social engineering and rework it's educational system to better reflect reality (i.e. demand less from less able students, and demand more from more able students).
Explain to me how any of the above doesn't accurately reflect the conclusions of the book. This isn't blind statistics and unfortunately those who are blind and think there is no value in this information are the kind of people in my experience who lack intuition to help guide them. no offense.
I work with logic, not intuition. You can have all the intuition in the world and still reach the wrong conclusions because you do not see the big picture or are missing a piece in the puzzle. I am not saying that you are wrong, simply that you are jumping to conclusions based on incomplete facts.
1. What do you mean with stratifying along class lines and how is this related to miscegenation?
2. Where do you get the idea that IQ is immutable?
3. What is the correlation between welfare and dysgenics? How would you deal with people who depend on welfare?
4. Why is that?
As for the conclusions in the book - I haven't read the book. I meant the statistics on IQ, that saying blacks have lower IQ doesn't necessarily mean that it is a genetic problem.
(10-08-2018, 04:20 PM)LutiChris Wrote: they can compete among themselves not with other races.
What if there is a very intelligent black person? Why can't this person compete with other races?
(10-08-2018, 04:20 PM)LutiChris Wrote: the first video i ever linked up points out that racism is a tool designed to instill fear and attack ones natural character by saying your world view is unacceptable
No, it isn't. Racism is an old word and was acceptable until Germany lost WW2.