05-02-2009, 09:30 PM
Let's make an analysis of Reaper's post:
Now, on another note, Drahcir is also too suspicious for me, he's voted for no kill all along.
And in that sense, he can accuse himself, since he's the one who writes the longest posts of all.
TOO BAD NO ONE LISTENS TO US.
*Ahem* I accuse the Reaper and Drahcir.
Quote:well, they killed someone who said nearly nothing. What does that mean? That they like the way its going and don't want to change anything. And that means they want darkfirzen and me to be accused because we aren't mafia.Well, they killed someone who didn't talk. What does that mean? They killed someone OUT OF THE SPOTLIGHT. Darkfirzen hasn't been accused for quite a while now.
Quote:Well... Haven't expected that... Thought they would kill sadbahv/dome/drahcir as they voted for no kill( and the mafia wants to see me and darkfirzen killed by the citizens, I'm pretty sure.)What's the relation between killing those and see him and darkfirzen killed by the citizens? Nothing backs him up.
Now, on another note, Drahcir is also too suspicious for me, he's voted for no kill all along.
Quote:Anyway, whom should I accuse? Nearly nobody said something. I'm wondering why bluephoenix is so quiet... I still find Silva suspicious, but I'm not sure. Anyway its the only suggestion I can make with some indizies.In other words: bla bla bla. He doesn't say anything.
Quote:How skelguardian spoke in the beginning was quite suspicious, but thats not enough to accuse him. I'm still wondering why they haven't killed LF2-Hacker in the beginning to make a joke, but thats also not enough. And Nave is also a bit suspicious, but maybe only because he says so much.Skelguardian just seems innocent, but it's a foggy area for now. Second, why would they kill LF2-Hacker to make a joke?

Quote:Accusing------Silva-------, but hoping that someone has a better, more reliable idea.In the end, he accuses Silva because his theory makes sense.
TOO BAD NO ONE LISTENS TO US.
*Ahem* I accuse the Reaper and Drahcir.