Mafia (Round 13, retry...)

[Silverthorn]

Code:

[15:33] <@BluePhoenix> silva
[15:33] <@BluePhoenix> you're not playing mafia, right?
[15:34] <Silvaer> no
[15:34] <@BluePhoenix> no as in "no, I'm not playing?"
[15:34] <Silvaer> no, i'm not playing.

Ergo: don't accuse Silva. Bot = useless placeholder. Useless placeholders = unimportant. Unimportant = not any role. Not any role = not involved in mafia-game. Not involved in mafia-game = to be ignored. /silva-accusation.

With that being said, let's try to get some order in here. Going by Blue Phoenix-logic, we should pick out the ones that did NOT accuse SirFrog. Why? There are/were 15 players at the beginning, only 3 of them belong to mafia. The chance to hit a mafia-member in the first round is 1:5 or 20%. We had no information about the strategy everyone had, so this was just a happy guessing round. The only information that there was around was among the mafia-members: they know each other and lynching one of their team-mates is a pretty bad choice. 2vs12 makes it really hard to win for mafia. One bad move and they're pretty much unveiled. Ergo: potential mafiosi would not accuse one of their mates. So, who did not accuse SirFrog at all?
- Nave
- SirFrog (lol)
- Alectric
- Drahcir
This would lead me to the conclusion that we should keep an eye on the three guys. Right, at least one of them is lying but we can't tell who. There's still a lot unclear and I hope this will clear up with the next lynch.

Following my 6th sense, I'd spontaneously accuse Drahcir. Defend yourself or die lol


@v: Thank you, captain obvious and tell that the morons. kthx