[2.2]Programmable AI via scripting

[A-Man]

My thanks to SomeoneElse's post is for confirmation. I haven't really combed through the source, but I could tell from what I've read in parts relevant to the injection process that there's nothing malicious with it here. Antiviruses just tend to get extra-cautious with injectors in general (as they're potentially harmful). Furthermore, upon looking up "WS.Reputation.1", the mother site explicitly mentions that it's only the antivirus being careful because "people don't usually go change the extension of their .txt files to .exe extension" (that being one case which would trigger the warning).

[Boop]

https://virustotal.com/en/file/f17e1d9ee...5/analysis

On a completely unrelated topic to AI, but related to false positives, the dll framework is detected by 13 antiviruses!

[mrsmallbee]

why DDrawRelease and DDrawDebug both call ddraw.dll?= =

[Som1Lse]

why DDrawRelease and DDrawDebug both call ddraw.dll?= =

Because the entire thing relies on the dll being called ddraw.dll, because that is what LF2 looks for. If we could have called it whatever we wanted we would have called it lf2ai.dll or something.