F's Artshop

[klodasmone]

[DELETED]

[klodasmone]

[DELETED]

[klodasmone]

Updating, not gravediggin' (maybe a little). A little out of practice, but will do, at least for the moment.

[DELETED]

[Marko]

i would love to see the whole progress of you making this kind of art. It looks incredible

[klodasmone]

i would love to see the whole progress of you making this kind of art. It looks incredible

Thanks, mate! I will do a tutorial eventually, when and if I feel like it. For now check out this old one: http://www.lf-empire.de/forum/showthread.php?tid=6541

[Gad]

Double edged sword swings.
Impressive... how you manage to apply 3 random filters on existing photos and claim this is art. Gross. Find some Viking guy that looks nothing like Rudolf beside the fact that they both have long hair. Then filter up, reduce color palette and tadaaah. So called bearded ninja. Shame.

[klodasmone]

Double edged sword swings.
Impressive... how you manage to apply 3 random filters on existing photos and claim this is art. Gross. Find some Viking guy that looks nothing like Rudolf beside the fact that they both have long hair. Then filter up, reduce color palette and tadaaah. So called bearded ninja. Shame.

What is art if not a copy of a copy of a copy? Is Marcel Duchamp's ready-made urinal a piece of art? Yes, truly, I think it is. Shameless.

[Gad]

Uuuh. It is just sad.
How dare you compare anything here to Duchamp?

And If you dont know, a clear copy of something with no credit is a theft also called a plagiarism. Anything is better than that. Even a guy who in your opinion does not progress, but still creates something with a little of imagination. At least he does something more than mixing two random pics and filters that entirely not blend together.

Learn to respect others and their efforts. Your topic here is a dumpster. PPL liked your images to the moment they understood its all copied sh*t. And yet you leave salty post under work of somebody that is at least trying.

[klodasmone]

Uuuh. It is just sad.
How dare you compare anything here to Duchamp?

And If you dont know, a clear copy of something with no credit is a theft also called a plagiarism. Anything is better than that. Even a guy who in your opinion does not progress, but still creates something with a little of imagination. At least he does something more than mixing two random pics and filters that entirely not blend together.

Learn to respect others and their efforts. Your topic here is a dumpster. PPL liked your images to the moment they understood its all copied sh*t. And yet you leave salty post under work of somebody that is at least trying.

I‘m glad you‘re so offended and care enough to challenge the status quo this much, so I‘ll indulge.
1. I‘m mentioning Duchamp here in the anti-art/Dadaistic sense, when he began using ready-made/found-objects in art in 1914.
2. I don‘t believe in plagiarism laws: All information – written, visual, etc. – should be free, and the government arbitrarily stating something doesn‘t mean it‘s actually good/just for you: In fact, when has the state do something, which isn‘t for its own good/profit.
3. Speaking of HM, he draws the same poses, and is actually using designs from LF2 and DBZ, if not direct imitations from the latter‘s anime screenshots (I mean Vegeta), so how the heck is that not an infringement on the copyright laws? Like I said, everything is a copy of a copy...
4. Speaking of mixing up pics, there‘s this thing called collage, a cut-up technique of images, which appeared, I think, with cubist movement, so it‘s a legit art technique.
5. This topic is a dumpster, I‘m a punk, and I like it.
In vino veritas.

[Lauli]

Well it's nice how you try to build a sense of meaning to your pictures by referencing art history and movements and whatnot, but be aware that your pictures only imply this in a very broad sense - the same way an instagram selfie with applied filters references ready-mades. The connection is there, but not the primary message that's being conveyed.
On the other hand you could always argue that what you're doing doesn't have any meaning and is simply playful fooling around, but then your points about your work being connected to Dadaism and Cubism fall flat, since you're reducing your work simply to immediate aesthetic.