Login

Silverthorn · 05-12-2010, 09:32 AM

You just had the luck to post a new reply within under 24 hours (congratz, your two posts were 23h58mins apart from each other lol)

Aaaaanyways, the sigs have gotten better with the next fonts. If I were to choose from the last two you posted, I'd probably go for Jack. I am not too fond of the background in the Knight-pic.

Just a small tip from my side, don't oversharpen/overstylize your backgrounds. Sometimes, too many details can ruin a picture, especially if it's drawing away from the focus (which, in this case, should be the character in front). Also, the glow behind the characters is looking interesting, but maybe a little too strong. Try out some more subtle effects

forgetlatios · 05-12-2010, 09:47 AM

yea now THAT is improvement. and you used too much blur on jack. sadly, bp said all the rest.

prince_freeza · (This post was last modified: 05-12-2010, 09:49 AM by prince_freeza.)

jack sig is the best one so far imo.

Taniaetc · 05-15-2010, 01:19 AM

(05-12-2010, 09:32 AM)Blue Phoenix Wrote: You just had the luck to post a new reply within under 24 hours (congratz, your two posts were 23h58mins apart from each other lol)

Aaaaanyways, the sigs have gotten better with the next fonts. If I were to choose from the last two you posted, I'd probably go for Jack. I am not too fond of the background in the Knight-pic.

Just a small tip from my side, don't oversharpen/overstylize your backgrounds. Sometimes, too many details can ruin a picture, especially if it's drawing away from the focus (which, in this case, should be the character in front). Also, the glow behind the characters is looking interesting, but maybe a little too strong. Try out some more subtle effects

Thanks, I kinda overdid the effects so it's a bit ruined. I'll try again.

(05-12-2010, 09:47 AM)forgetlatios Wrote: yea now THAT is improvement. and you used too much blur on jack. sadly, bp said all the rest.

Yeah I know.

(05-12-2010, 09:49 AM)prince_freeza Wrote: jack sig is the best one so far imo.

Okay then. IMO Jack's the best too.
One more try...
[Image: huntery.png]

OMG DEEP WALLPAPER! (Click to View)

C&c plz.

forgetlatios · (This post was last modified: 05-15-2010, 07:10 AM by forgetlatios.)

AUGH. THAT HUNTER SIG... JUST PWNSOME. AND FRESH.
i mean its pwnsome!!!!!
that deep wallpaper- looks pixelated and whatever you stated.

@below: its fine to use lf2 chars for sigs...
1) this is a lf2 fan site
2) for userbars
3) if you know how to.

Dj-BooB · 05-15-2010, 06:40 AM

im not a pro at makin sigs but my advice is to try makin sigs that arent lf2. lf2 charas are small and pixelated. and if you use other renders you can use a copy of the render as a background

Taniaetc · 05-21-2010, 10:27 AM

(05-15-2010, 01:52 AM)forgetlatios Wrote: AUGH. THAT HUNTER SIG... JUST PWNSOME. AND FRESH.
i mean its pwnsome!!!!!
that deep wallpaper- looks pixelated and whatever you stated.

I thought the Hunter sig was silly... but let's move to another topic.
Yeah I overdid it AGAIN.

(05-15-2010, 06:40 AM)Dj-BooB Wrote: im not a pro at makin sigs but my advice is to try makin sigs that arent lf2. lf2 charas are small and pixelated. and if you use other renders you can use a copy of the render as a background

It's not that pixelated actually. You can just ... BLUR!
Yeah coincidence with what dj-boob said. No LF2 chars this time and it's made for MY BOOK COVER. But I don't want to show those, they are darn crap.
Flavour cats, I mixed up paint.NET (yes forgetlatios that program is a pwn) with Artweaver by combining their features and...
[Image: dennisg.png]