Lol!!!, are you actually comparing things that involves harming other people around you with thing which is totally self-dependent ?????
Hypothetically speaking, Would affect you the fact neighbour aborted a child last night the same it would affect you if knew that the same neighbour murdered someone last night? Of course it would not.
In first case you would think of her as selfish b*tch and probably not talk to her ever again because she doesn't share same beliefs (which is pretty lame in my opinion), while in second case you would be concerned about your safety.
It's not like "thieving, rape, murder or pretty much any other crime". Crime, necessary, involves harming other people and harmony of place while abortion is personal choice the same way you can choose to or not to believe in God therefore you can't call it "pretty much crime".
If you don't agree with someones beliefs, simply don't socialite with them.
The fact she doesn't want baby (or can't support) doesn't make her pretty much murderer. You can be disgusted by such people, but they did nothing morally wrong here. To make something crime it should be morally relevant.
Something is morally relevant if:
1. refers to being which has moral status of the facility
2. done on purpose
3. personal choice
4. done with knowledge about it
5. procedure has moral quality (good or bad)
- It doesn't refer to any living thing and it has no moral quality (Bible and other religous stuffs doesn't apply here because there are plenty of atheists as well)
Therefore abortion is morally irrelevant, meaning is not crime, meaning there is no reasonable argument against abortion.
(Listening teacher actually paid off hehe)
it's simple, very simple. You are complicating everything involving moral which doesn't apply here..... As everything, it should be regulated under the law that's why court is necessary. Under valid arguments, which i suppose are listed plenty of times in this thread, she should be allowed to abort a fetus/embryo.
Hypothetically speaking, Would affect you the fact neighbour aborted a child last night the same it would affect you if knew that the same neighbour murdered someone last night? Of course it would not.
In first case you would think of her as selfish b*tch and probably not talk to her ever again because she doesn't share same beliefs (which is pretty lame in my opinion), while in second case you would be concerned about your safety.
It's not like "thieving, rape, murder or pretty much any other crime". Crime, necessary, involves harming other people and harmony of place while abortion is personal choice the same way you can choose to or not to believe in God therefore you can't call it "pretty much crime".
If you don't agree with someones beliefs, simply don't socialite with them.
The fact she doesn't want baby (or can't support) doesn't make her pretty much murderer. You can be disgusted by such people, but they did nothing morally wrong here. To make something crime it should be morally relevant.
Something is morally relevant if:
1. refers to being which has moral status of the facility
2. done on purpose
3. personal choice
4. done with knowledge about it
5. procedure has moral quality (good or bad)
- It doesn't refer to any living thing and it has no moral quality (Bible and other religous stuffs doesn't apply here because there are plenty of atheists as well)
Therefore abortion is morally irrelevant, meaning is not crime, meaning there is no reasonable argument against abortion.
(Listening teacher actually paid off hehe)
it's simple, very simple. You are complicating everything involving moral which doesn't apply here..... As everything, it should be regulated under the law that's why court is necessary. Under valid arguments, which i suppose are listed plenty of times in this thread, she should be allowed to abort a fetus/embryo.

Chat
