Chat
Discord
Classic Mafia - Conclusion!
03-04-2016, 05:59 PM
This reason is considerably better than last day, but I have some concerns about it:
1. You didn't consider the pairs in which you're mafia. It's obvious why you did it, and it's ok if you want to explain why you vote someone, but you shouldn't be able to convince us to vote that player just because of that. Each one of us would have to use the same method, from our point of view.
2. It assumes that Mafias won't vote for each other. While this is mostly true in critical situations (like the past day), it's not a safe bet. Apart from the typical mafia-lynching-mafia strategy, we should consider that when the lynch is 'decided', a vote thrown to a player that is not going to be lynched has much less weight.
3. It considers votes that were changed before the day end. In my opinion, and for obvious reasons, these votes are almost meaningless.
4. It's only useful if you assume that empirefantasy is innocent.
I'll vote Bamboori again (yes, I'm stubborn). I have stated some underlying reasons when I was about to die, and I still want to know his role. The fact that Nave and Jernemies were 'dead set' on me last day (Nave changed his vote to Luti when left with no other option), makes me think that one of them has to be Bamboori's partner, if Bamboori ends up being mafia.
@TheNave
While looking through the thread I found this. I know a lot of things happened since you posted this, but I find it weird that you're now voting someone from your safelist, and not someone from the "most likely mafia"-list (me) or from the "could have tricked me"-list (Ramond, Bamboori).
But you already stated your reasons to do so, I guess. Maybe you can update the list?
1. You didn't consider the pairs in which you're mafia. It's obvious why you did it, and it's ok if you want to explain why you vote someone, but you shouldn't be able to convince us to vote that player just because of that. Each one of us would have to use the same method, from our point of view.
2. It assumes that Mafias won't vote for each other. While this is mostly true in critical situations (like the past day), it's not a safe bet. Apart from the typical mafia-lynching-mafia strategy, we should consider that when the lynch is 'decided', a vote thrown to a player that is not going to be lynched has much less weight.
3. It considers votes that were changed before the day end. In my opinion, and for obvious reasons, these votes are almost meaningless.
4. It's only useful if you assume that empirefantasy is innocent.
That being said, I'm curious about what will come up if I use that method. (Click to View)
I'll vote Bamboori again (yes, I'm stubborn). I have stated some underlying reasons when I was about to die, and I still want to know his role. The fact that Nave and Jernemies were 'dead set' on me last day (Nave changed his vote to Luti when left with no other option), makes me think that one of them has to be Bamboori's partner, if Bamboori ends up being mafia.
@TheNave
(03-01-2016, 12:06 PM)TheNave Wrote: well, whatever you do, even if you lynch me... this is my SAFELIST! Players on that list are extremly unlikely mafia:
- @empirefantasy
- @Jernemies
This is my, "could have tricked me but most likely innocent aswell"-list
- @Darl
- @Ramond
- @Bamboori
And here my, "most likely two out of those three are mafia"-list:
- @Apocalipsis
- @Simoneon
- @LutiChris
While looking through the thread I found this. I know a lot of things happened since you posted this, but I find it weird that you're now voting someone from your safelist, and not someone from the "most likely mafia"-list (me) or from the "could have tricked me"-list (Ramond, Bamboori).
But you already stated your reasons to do so, I guess. Maybe you can update the list?