(03-20-2016, 05:00 PM)A-Man Wrote: How is this more "sane"? I totally agree with scouts staying under hood until they die, since all the info they can offer can be verified when the person they've checked dies. I can now claim to be an inquisitor and further say I've checked you and it turned out you're a werewolf, but then what? You're dead, and nobody can prove I'm lying (except the werewolves, but they wouldn't be stupid to confirm). Even then, the werewolf aligned inquisitor could have changed his alignment for that turn. Information inquisitors have gathered are only good to themselves.
The fact that the other inquisitor(s) refuse(s) to reveal themselves should make us trust TheNave more, however. And really, TheNave shouldn't go announcing whom he's willing to check.
There is no way we can trust Nave even now. Best strategy is let everyone gather their missing pieces for the GRAND puzzle and figure who is lying from bigger chunk of data. Now revelation of any other inquisitor only helps WW.
This is like a sudoku again but longer the game goes, easier it becomes to solve. But exposing clue-finders to WW only makes game harder to solve from town side.
Also, to add, the way you are putting some trust on nave gives me the impression that you both are suspicious >.>
![[Image: afro-davis.jpeg]](https://mfc-images.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/general/afro-davis.jpeg)
![[Image: afro-davis.jpeg]](https://mfc-images.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/general/afro-davis.jpeg)
![[Image: afro-davis.jpeg]](https://mfc-images.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/general/afro-davis.jpeg)

Chat
