RaMafia 2

[A-Man]

And people WILL vote for no-kill if they want to and there is nothing bad or wrong with it. Your endgame plots do not fit to this game.

no-kill is harmful. And well if they do, they shouldn't.

Also, at this stage, it is so very wow certain that you are going to die for sure. Why u even care who he votes for?

I know for certain that at least 2 of the above have voted me just going with the majority and because they thought I'll be dying anyway. I have the right to defend myself and make sure every vote against me is justified. Werewoves' votes are never justified, no?
And isn't it against your premise to encourage people to keep their thoughts to themselves? It just happens to be so contradictory that your plot involves gathering as much information as possible, but you attack me for attacking those whom votes do not reflect themselves. If things weren't so one-sided, maybe we would've could've forced Bards to use their abilities to ensure their targets are lynched. We would now have some information on whether there is a Bard living now at all or not.

If he suspects someone for some reason, he can express it but why would he vote after this point...

Just words can't be tracked down later in the game and are not as concrete as actual votes against people they suspect.

Imagine town having 3 members of (Inq+Knt) and WW having 1. Do you think is it worth lynching 3 townies to kill 1 WW?

You keep telling me to imagine a certain scenario your plot favors. But I'm talking about chances scenarios can happen. And mine happens to have a relatively higher chance with what's more probable to be.

Unlikely.

Where are your supporting details?

Not really, as long as the inquisitors survive long enough. About TheNave, we don't even know if he is town aligned or not. If he is not, then the town inquisitors are safe for now. Moreover, this could be a plotting between TheNave and Bamboori. I do not think Bamboori was this naive as to expose TheNave without thinking. He either wants to kill TheNave or to plot with him.

But if he's a werewolf, how does he even be in danger if you guys don't want to lynch an inquisitor? But if he is, assuming the werewolves think about the inquisitors in such a manner that you do, then he dies and your grand plot falls apart. TheNave and Bamboori are associates you say? So you'll kill Bamboori, but not TheNave.

The point is, Bamboori's information, regardless of his alignment, are truthy; if he lies, then he takes the risk of being figured out as the information he comes up with is verifiable. That's why I assume it's safer to trust his word than the word of an inquisitor. So if you're going against Bamboori, why not go with TheNave?

It is the same as lynching the inquisitors. We are 11 players. Killing inquisitors could be killing 2 townies and one hellblazer. Or killing 1 townie and 0 hellblazers. And killing the knights could be something of the sort. Also, nothing guarantees the scout will find all inquisitors/knights early. You could have the bad luck of killing the townie ones and the hellblazers being undetected for long.

Same? No, of course there is a difference. You guys proposed the 2 vs 1 composition because you figured 2 may be the number required for inquisitors to function. With Knights, one can be useful by himself. I'm really annoyed to see that you're already doing your calculation based on the assumption you favored. That serves to show how biased your arguments have become.