(03-24-2016, 09:07 AM)LutiChris Wrote: Yeah like that makes a difference. Anything lower than 33% im not going to value as much.Are you going to query that under the 'opinion-based' category too? 17% or even 1% is more significant than 0%.
Quote:Edit) also i still dont undetstand where ur getti bg these numbeers from?? You are including future predictions. Im counting what has already happened in the past up until this point ehich is 12%-There are 8 people alive now.
If we go to the future then yeah we can increase that number to over 90% keep it relevant.
-There are 1 people to be lynched today.
Leaving 7 people alive. A knight can't protect himself, so take 1 from that and that leaves lots of 6 people to protect from. Number of wanted outcomes/Number of possible outcomes = 1/6 = 0.16` ~ 17%.
Quote:They are. You would be the 0% drawer, since, assuming you're the only townie Knight, you can't protect yourself (and nothing can save you).Quote:It doesn't matter. They can just go with the drawer with 0% chance to get caught robbingplease stay on topic. How does that even relate to ww. They arent given 100% or 0% this or that. We have a very small number. You cant use that comparison. My analogy makes sense if its 12% but saying 0%?? I dont even go that way with god.
Edit: I want to direct everybody's attention to the votes one-sidedness. It appears none at all is trying to defend Rhino, whereas Luti has been getting the blind nods.
![[Image: signature.png]](http://s3.postimg.org/wedqxlk3n/signature.png)
A-Engine: A new beat em up game engine inspired by LF2. Coming soon
A-Engine Dev Blog - Update #8: Timeout

Chat
