Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[DataChanger] LF2 IDE v3.4.0
#42
(09-07-2016, 08:10 AM)A-Man Wrote:  That can be annoying, in my opinion. Having the number (or even the tag, as you suggest) highlighted is more "reassuring". A double click isn't really that much of an effort. Perhaps, it can be reduced to a single click if it does as you say, but with the position of the caret and not the cursor?

(and from a technical point of view, it would be more trouble than its worth if the library he's using doesn't have a way to convert mouse position to line-character position)
I was talking about the caret (text cursor) though I didn't make it particularly obvious.
For some reason I dislike the word caret.
Age ratings for movies and games (and similar) have never been a good idea.
One can learn a lot from reinventing wheels.
An unsound argument is not the same as an invalid one.
volatile in C++ does not mean thread-safe.
Do not make APIs unnecessarily asynchronous.
Make C++ operator > again
Trump is an idiot.
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
[DataChanger] LF2 IDE v3.4.0 - by NightmareX1337 - 12-28-2013, 06:29 PM
RE: [DCer] LF2 IDE - bored? - by empirefantasy - 12-28-2013, 09:29 PM
RE: [DCer] LF2 IDE - bored? - by AmadisLFE - 12-29-2013, 01:14 PM
RE: [DCer] LF2 IDE - bored? - by Nyamaiku - 12-29-2013, 01:37 PM
RE: [DCer] LF2 IDE - bored? - by A-Man - 12-31-2013, 01:05 PM
RE: [DCer] LF2 IDE - bored? - by NightmareX1337 - 01-05-2014, 09:13 PM
RE: [DCer] LF2 IDE - bored? - by empirefantasy - 01-06-2014, 10:13 PM
RE: [DCer] LF2 IDE - bored? - by NightmareX1337 - 01-12-2014, 08:45 AM
RE: [DataChanger] LF2 IDE v3.3.0 ~ DCing made easy - by Som1Lse - 09-07-2016, 09:18 AM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)