Login

Reaper · (This post was last modified: 06-05-2009, 03:59 PM by Reaper.)

hm.... I don't really like the first one, but its well-made.
Second one... I don't know how much you changed, but it looks very good. Well, it doesn't have to be complex all the time. And the comment on deviantart is so sad...
Third one is awesome. Wish I could do that

ZOL · 06-08-2009, 03:55 PM

Nice! I especially like the last one, it's very abstract-like. You're exceptionally skilled at lighting and composition.

Lord Anu · 06-08-2009, 04:52 PM

This pictures are awesome! I like them!

Fiandsnuve · (This post was last modified: 06-09-2009, 01:03 AM by Fiandsnuve.)

i give 654 points of 100 points for your images!

Elias · 06-17-2009, 10:26 PM

Wow the pics are awesome.
I like the burning city and a guy standing on top.

Silverthorn · 06-20-2009, 11:13 AM

Thanks to you all

Time for a little update:

And I completely remade this one the last week. Well, this here is the final result:

Reaper · 06-20-2009, 01:17 PM

well, second one was just great before, its is great now, too.
First one looks pretty interesting, but the special thing about it is mainly in the middle and bottom. Means that the upper part isn't that interesting. But if you delete it, it would probably look so... restricted. I don't know how to say it. It would lose the impression of the wide sky a bit. So well, the upper part is bothering me a bit, but I don't know how to make it better.
Anyway, nice work.

snorsorbet · 06-20-2009, 04:33 PM

I have nothing to add from Reaper's post

In the second one look ground the man stands on like it has the wrong perspective. And the man himself doesn't fit into the rest of the style.
I also reacted to the smoke. It just doesn't look that good. I don't know why...
Otherwise it looks VERY good and it looks like you spent much time doing it... Good job!

Silverthorn · 06-20-2009, 06:22 PM

(06-20-2009, 01:17 PM)Reaper Wrote: First one looks pretty interesting, but the special thing about it is mainly in the middle and bottom. Means that the upper part isn't that interesting. But if you delete it, it would probably look so... restricted. I don't know how to say it. It would lose the impression of the wide sky a bit. So well, the upper part is bothering me a bit, but I don't know how to make it better.

Yeah, I've two versions of this, one with the top third and one without. The one without just isn't giving the desired amount of epicness

Or, to say it in other ways, if you clutter up a picture with only details, it gets pretty "heavy" in terms of layout. Too many details can destroy the entire image, that's why I left some quasi-blank space on both top and bottom

(06-20-2009, 04:33 PM)snorsorbet Wrote: it looks like you spent much time doing it...

33 hours in Photoshop + 50 hours rendering, to be precise.
Hmm, I don't quite get the perspective-deal, he's supposed to face the fire & moon and I think he does exactly that...

Anyways, thanks for your comments!

Dr.Death · 06-21-2009, 09:35 PM

Your pictures are really great!!I like them.Are they in original size in the first site?If they are bigger some could well used for a wallpaper.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me