Posts: 1,542
Threads: 77
Joined: May 2011
STM Wrote:I had mob lynched two innocents. Who's the second?
mfc Wrote:lynch amadis, it's simple. no talk = lynch. I want to see him at least try to defend himself. being active without any posts? fishyyyyyyyyyy suspiciouuuuuuuuuussss. Amadis is active?
Thanks given by:
Posts: 861
Threads: 50
Joined: Mar 2008
(01-16-2016, 02:01 PM)A-Man Wrote: STM Wrote:I had mob lynched two innocents. Who's the second? Sorry, only 1 innocent, being you. I forgot I voted no-kill on day 2 halfway through the post.
Amadis came online a couple days ago, but he failed to post at all.
Thanks given by:
Posts: 595
Threads: 47
Joined: Dec 2011
(01-16-2016, 01:37 PM)STM1993 Wrote: ...
That's all I have to say. I'm keeping my vote on Rhino for now only because I have no bloody clue what's going on anymore and to keep a tie going.
I can respect that. My thoughts are same here but with a bit more mindfucks.
I'm also convinced that no kill is useless.
So I will vote for MangaD.
Also killing amadis isn't a bad option either.
(03-20-2016, 06:41 PM)mfc Wrote: Be the unsqueezable sponge! My new life motto!
Thanks given by:
Posts: 507
Threads: 24
Joined: May 2011
01-16-2016, 02:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-16-2016, 02:13 PM by mfc.)
@A-Man: Ramon told that. He logs in the forum, he was in who was online today list.
Killing everyone silently without posting in public.
Reminds me of last game's pf.
Stop killing each other and finish him
@Luti: Why would ramon kick someone actively pm'ing him who to shoot in nights
Thanks given by:
Posts: 1,542
Threads: 77
Joined: May 2011
We've no information about him or whatsoever, so that's be totally random. It's a good idea to let the sheriff check on him though.
Thanks given by:
Posts: 507
Threads: 24
Joined: May 2011
(01-16-2016, 02:14 PM)A-Man Wrote: We've no information about him or whatsoever, so that's be totally random. It's a good idea to let the sheriff check on him though.
First you say someone should be lynched, disagreeing with nokill. Then you go for killing maybe innocent people but waiting before checking Amadis, who was active with 0 posts.
Thanks given by:
Posts: 1,542
Threads: 77
Joined: May 2011
01-16-2016, 02:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-16-2016, 02:21 PM by A-Man.)
(01-16-2016, 02:17 PM)mfc Wrote: First you say someone should be lynched, disagreeing with nokill. Then you go for killing maybe innocent people but waiting before checking Amadis, who was active with 0 posts. I am totally against no-kill for obvious reasons, even if we're going to lynch someone randomly. What I would argue against, however, is lynching someone when there is a more likely suspect available.
edit:
Quote:@Luti: Why would ramon kick someone actively pm'ing him who to shoot in nights
I just want to say that I know Ramond wouldn't kick someone out for people to NOT think this is the reason.
Thanks given by:
Posts: 507
Threads: 24
Joined: May 2011
This mafia game's summary: Silent, smart mafioso doing job cleanly behind shadows.
While,
Loud, confused, bloodthirsty citizens killing each other by accusin each other over weird things, pm'ing each other death threats, faking pm/conversations. Really, you need to start accusing people who you never suspected. You try to build up evidence based on posts made here. Or weird stuff you send each other. But actual mafia knows this and stays silent, smart, not making any weird or suspicious moves.
Why would they do, citizens are making enough commotion, let them kill each other. Maybe add some smart feedback to current lynches .gif) No need to get lynched
Thanks given by:
Posts: 595
Threads: 47
Joined: Dec 2011
01-16-2016, 02:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-16-2016, 02:29 PM by Rhino.Freak.)
Guys I'm hearing ghosts whispers right now.
(03-20-2016, 06:41 PM)mfc Wrote: Be the unsqueezable sponge! My new life motto!
Posts: 507
Threads: 24
Joined: May 2011
Yes, ghosts are talking. Allowedly talking.
Thanks given by:
|